I think that the Balanced Refugee Reform Act seemed to address many of the legitimate policy objectives that the government seeks to attain under Bill C-31. What Bill C-31 adds to it are provisions that are unconstitutional, and from a policy perspective, I think, problematic and unlikely to achieve what they claim.
Let me just say that with respect to clauses 18 and 19, what is being portrayed is a lack of power to deal with people who, let's say, arrive in Canada, acquire refugee status, and then take a holiday back in their country of origin. That's the scenario, right? There is no lack of power to deal with that situation under the existing law. There may be a lack of resources. There may be a choice not to deploy the resources to deal with those situations, but there is no lack of power. There is ample power.