Thank you, Chair.
I realize that sometimes I can take a little while to get to the point, but the fact is that I do have that right.
On the point, I was talking about the minister, and I was talking about the fact that it's unusual. To put it in context, I was recognizing that there are exceptions.
You and I have both had an opportunity to travel this beautiful country as MPs and MPPs. We know that things are done differently in different parts of the country—let alone within the Commonwealth—even though we all share the same basic parliamentary structure. My point is that having ministers come in on private members' bills is—abuse is a bit of a strong word, but it's certainly not the intention of what private members' business is about. That's why it's called a private member's bill. It's not called any member's or all members'; it's called a private member's—