It had to do with how broadly one can talk about the issues.
I believe I have said that you are restricted to debating and giving reasons why you support or are against this motion that is asking the committee for an extension of 30 sitting days, or the opposite. I guess the point of order is on the issue of latitude.
My initial ruling was in favour of a narrow latitude and my recollection of your point of order—and please correct me, because this is what we're in the midst of—was that I as the chairman am being too narrow.
Is that your understanding of the point of order, Mr. Lamoureux.