Evidence of meeting #3 for Citizenship and Immigration in the 41st Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was program.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Sarah Anson-Cartwright  Director, Skills Policy, Canadian Chamber of Commerce
Gordon Griffith  Director, Education, Engineers Canada
Richard Kurland  Policy Analyst and Lawyer, As an Individual
Michael Kydd  President, Merit Nova Scotia

12:50 p.m.

Liberal

John McCallum Liberal Markham—Unionville, ON

Okay. Thank you very much.

12:50 p.m.

NDP

The Vice-Chair NDP Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe

Mr. Menegakis, you have approximately three minutes.

12:50 p.m.

Conservative

Costas Menegakis Conservative Richmond Hill, ON

Thank you very much, Madam Chair.

Thanks to our witnesses for being here.

Mr. Kydd, my question is for you. You mentioned that the construction industry needs skilled and experienced workers, and the industry hasn't been that successful in penetrating the immigrant worker market, if you will.

In your opinion, how will the EOI system be able to facilitate immigrant construction workers specifically?

12:55 p.m.

President, Merit Nova Scotia

Michael Kydd

I thank the honourable member for his question.

We understand that this system is being replicated from a very successful model out of New Zealand and Australia. The numbers seem to indicate that over the past couple of years we've seen a rise in permanent long-term immigrants, from about 8,000 to about 20,000, just in New Zealand alone. Those are people who are entering the skilled trades because the demand is there and there's a process in place that's allowing them to fill those demands.

With New Zealand, for example, the request for construction workers is basically coming from two major populations: India and China, with China being the number one country. Since 1999, the Chinese have had 20% growth in the construction industry, year over year. They have approximately 24.1 million people working in the construction industry alone.

What we've seen is that countries who have adopted this model are recognizing those niche markets. They are able to pull those workers in and offer them employment and stability within their respective regions and within the respective supply and demand force.

I think the EOI model allows that system to flourish by being able to work together.

12:55 p.m.

Conservative

Costas Menegakis Conservative Richmond Hill, ON

Thank you very much.

Mr. Wallace, I pass the question over to you, sir.

12:55 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

Thank you very much.

To Mr. Kurland, very quickly, it's on a completely different topic, in a sense. I agree with you on information sharing, particularly from CRA.

You're an immigration worker, is that correct?

12:55 p.m.

Policy Analyst and Lawyer, As an Individual

12:55 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

Based on your support of information sharing, to be able to make decisions and not force employers to repeat things.... We have another ministry whose responsibility is to find those who come to this country, who have applied for landed immigrant status, have now been denied it and are on the lam, let's say, or they're here illegally. That organization, the public safety ministry, does not have access, for example, to CRA records to see if those people are paying taxes and where they're living, so we can find them and send them on their way.

Are you in favour of CRA being able to release that information to that organization?

12:55 p.m.

Policy Analyst and Lawyer, As an Individual

Richard Kurland

No.

For practical reasons, the CRA senior people have advised me year after year that it may interfere with the integrity of their revenue collection potential. People need to know, even if they're doing bad things, that CRA will not share information with law enforcement.

12:55 p.m.

NDP

The Vice-Chair NDP Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe

Thank you very much. Time has expired.

Mr. Kurland, once again, thank you very much for appearing before this committee.

Before wrapping up our meeting, I would like to give you one last message.

At our next meeting, committee members will have an opportunity to recommend amendments to the Standing Committee on Finance. You will make our job much easier if you send your amendments to the clerk 24 hours in advance. If you don't, please bring copies of your amendments in both official languages so that they can be circulated to the members of the committee. Once again, the purpose is to make this committee's job easier.

Thank you very much, colleagues, for your cooperation.

The meeting is adjourned.