As outlined in the regulatory impact analysis statement that's publicly available, the primary rationale is to increase the flexible authorities for the way in which the oath can be administered and to provide an electronic option that people can self-select in the future if they wish to do so.
I think what has not come out as clearly, perhaps, in some of the public commentary is that ceremonies will continue. They're important events to mark a significant and important occasion, as the member has mentioned. Those ceremonies will continue.
However, those who may have this option in the future could face a variety of circumstances. They may be in a remote location. They may need to travel. They may need a form of accommodation—