Okay.
Do you think there will be any concerns expressed by senators at the fact that this committee heard one version of testimony saying there are issues and then two years ago at a Senate committee government officials of a higher or more senior rank, including an assistant deputy minister, expressed no concerns with the content of the bill?
How will senators react to that? Are they likely to call more witnesses just to ensure that they get a fulsome answer to explain why the department's position seems to have shifted over two years?