That's what I am speaking to. I just voiced my disappointment about the other one.
This amendment would make it so that the treaty would not come into force earlier than 30 sitting days after it has been tabled. The motion that I convinced my colleagues to support earlier passed, which says that it has to be tabled. Now we're asking for....
My first amendment was to say that Parliament should approve it all. That was deemed inadmissible, so here we are with this one, which I think is a reasonable.... It's not as good as the first one, but it's reasonable to protect the supremacy of Parliament and to ensure that we can actually have a debate around it as we'd have 30 sitting days between the tabling and the coming into force of a particular treaty.
I'm excited to have this one go forward to allow Parliament the ability to see, debate, question the minister and bring in witnesses if it needs to. The previous amendment that we passed had that “After it is tabled, the treaty stands referred to—