Evidence of meeting #26 for Industry, Science and Technology in the 39th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was amendment.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Dan Shaw  Committee Researcher
Mark Mahabir  Committee Researcher
Clerk of the Committee  Ms. Michelle Tittley

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

Dean Del Mastro Conservative Peterborough, ON

Can you make that “and/or”?

12:30 p.m.

The Clerk

Is that “and/or their delegates”?

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Rajotte

That was not Mr. Carrie's amendment.

Is it “and/or”, Mr. Carrie?

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

Colin Carrie Conservative Oshawa, ON

If that would be more inclusive, I would take that as a friendly suggestion.

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Rajotte

Okay, it is “and/or their delegates”.

Thank you.

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

Colin Carrie Conservative Oshawa, ON

Do we have the president of CSA somewhere in there? We do? Okay, I didn't hear that.

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Rajotte

Thank you.

We'll go to Ms. Nash.

12:30 p.m.

NDP

Peggy Nash NDP Parkdale—High Park, ON

I'll pass for the moment.

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Rajotte

Madame Brunelle.

12:30 p.m.

Bloc

Paule Brunelle Bloc Trois-Rivières, QC

I wonder, Mr. Chairman, if this amendment is in order since it is quite similar to the one we have just voted down. It says that we would hear officials and representatives but not ministers. So, it is exactly the same thing, the point being that we would not hear the ministers. I believe that such a motion is not in order. We have already voted against that amendment and this one is the same.

12:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Rajotte

Well, they did put in “and/or their delegates”, and the amendment by Mr. Carrie included crossing out entirely “Minister of Justice”. It also included crossing out “before a decision concerning the sale is rendered under the Investment Canada Act”.

Perhaps those should have been three separate amendments, but there was more in Mr. Carrie's amendment than simply providing for delegates or witnesses from departments.

(Amendment negatived [See Minutes of Proceedings])

Mr. Stanton.

12:35 p.m.

Conservative

Bruce Stanton Conservative Simcoe North, ON

I have another amendment suggestion. Where it says “a representative of MDA”, I wonder if we could get somebody higher than a sales rep, like a senior officer or president--somebody with some standing. As it is, a representative could be anybody, in all honesty. I don't think you want the spin master here. Let's hear it from the president or a senior officer of MDA. I don't know the best terminology, but it should be....

12:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Rajotte

I'm sure if MDA appears before the committee they would send a senior representative. I don't want to nickel and dime the motion to death.

12:35 p.m.

Conservative

Bruce Stanton Conservative Simcoe North, ON

Okay. I just want to make sure there's somebody here who can speak on their behalf.

12:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Rajotte

We can make that very clear in the e-mail we send to them.

(Motion as amended agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])

12:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Rajotte

Now we have 20 minutes for the services sector.

Thank you.

[Proceedings continue in camera]-