Evidence of meeting #32 for Industry, Science and Technology in the 40th Parliament, 3rd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was data.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Mel Cappe  President, Institute for Research on Public Policy
Ian McKinnon  Chair, National Statistics Council
Joseph Lam  Vice-President, Canada First Community Organization
James P. Henderson  As an Individual
James L. Turk  Executive Director, Canadian Association of University Teachers
Michael Ornstein  Member, Research Advisory Committee, Canadian Association of University Teachers
Clément Chartier  President, Métis National Council
Michael R. Veall  Professor, Department of Economics, McMaster University, As an Individual
Jean-Pierre Beaud  Dean, Faculty of Political Science and Law, University of Québec in Montréal, As an Individual
Dave Rutherford  As an Individual
Victor Oh  Honorary President of the Mississauga Chinese Business Association, Confederation of Greater Toronto Chinese Business Association
Denis Bélisle  Vice-President, Federation of University Professors of Quebec
Ken Murdoch  Coordinator, Social Planning Council of Winnipeg
Micheal Vonn  Policy Director, British Columbia Civil Liberties Association
Peggy Taillon  President and Chief Executive Officer, Canadian Council on Social Development
Pierre Noreau  President, Association francophone pour le savoir
Xinsheng  Simon) Zhong (Executive Director, Toronto Community and Culture Centre
Lawrie McFarlane  Editorial Writer, Victoria Times Colonist, As an Individual

1:20 p.m.

Coordinator, Social Planning Council of Winnipeg

Ken Murdoch

It's hard for me to reply to that, as I think it would be for anybody else. We don't like mandatory fines and things like that, but we have certain other instances where we get fined—

1:20 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Lake Conservative Edmonton—Mill Woods—Beaumont, AB

With respect, though, mandatory means penalty, so there has to be a penalty. The penalty is a fine or jail time.

1:20 p.m.

Coordinator, Social Planning Council of Winnipeg

Ken Murdoch

I have to stop at a stop sign. If I don't, I risk a fine.

1:20 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Lake Conservative Edmonton—Mill Woods—Beaumont, AB

The safety of others is at risk if you don't stop at the stop sign, though. I think you'd have a hard time convincing this mother of three who is living near the poverty line that someone else's safety or life is at risk because she doesn't tell the government how much housework she did last week.

1:25 p.m.

Coordinator, Social Planning Council of Winnipeg

Ken Murdoch

When the reason for that question is explained—which I think is one of the problems we're dealing with, because we have been so used to having just the questions and not the reasons behind them—I think it would give some benefit to a person in that situation—

1:25 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Lake Conservative Edmonton—Mill Woods—Beaumont, AB

Okay, so some people would not get fined.

1:25 p.m.

Coordinator, Social Planning Council of Winnipeg

Ken Murdoch

—and we're asking that person, therefore, to respond, to give that information so that we can address that question as Canadians.

1:25 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Lake Conservative Edmonton—Mill Woods—Beaumont, AB

So if new Canadians receive a census form that asks them what their religion is and they say they're uncomfortable answering that question, should they be fined $500 or threatened with jail time?

1:25 p.m.

Coordinator, Social Planning Council of Winnipeg

Ken Murdoch

I might say the fine should be $10.

1:25 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Lake Conservative Edmonton—Mill Woods—Beaumont, AB

What would you say?

1:25 p.m.

Coordinator, Social Planning Council of Winnipeg

Ken Murdoch

I think the question is real and has verity, and in order to make it mandatory, you have to have some penalty. If we're talking about jail and $500, we're talking about the extremities of that penality.

That's a different question from whether it's mandatory.

1:25 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Lake Conservative Edmonton—Mill Woods—Beaumont, AB

We're not, actually. It's $500 per question. So when you multiply it by the number of questions, it's pretty significant. I think there's some clarity needed in the argument.

August 27th, 2010 / 1:25 p.m.

NDP

Brian Masse NDP Windsor West, ON

On a point of order, Mr. Chair—

1:25 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Michael Chong

Mr. Lake, Mr. Masse has a point of order.

1:25 p.m.

NDP

Brian Masse NDP Windsor West, ON

I'm just curious. Could we have the researchers give us information about how many people have been fined and how much?

1:25 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Michael Chong

That's not a point of order, but that's something we'll get them to do.

If you have requests of the chair that aren't points of order, please take them up with me after the meeting or when your intervention takes place, so that we can give the people who do have the floor the full time.

Mr. Lake, go ahead.

1:25 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Lake Conservative Edmonton—Mill Woods—Beaumont, AB

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

I acknowledge the fairness of that question. I guess the answer to that question is that it's the threat of fines and jail time.

If you're a new Canadian coming to Canada and you have somebody at your door asking you questions such as what your religion is or how much time you spend with your kids, and it's your first experience with the government—because, let's face it, that person is seen as a representative of the government—I think your being threatened with fines and jail time for not answering is an issue.

Maybe I'll see if Mr. Oh wants to respond to that.

1:25 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Michael Chong

Go ahead, Mr. Oh.

1:25 p.m.

Honorary President of the Mississauga Chinese Business Association, Confederation of Greater Toronto Chinese Business Association

Victor Oh

In my contact with the communities, the feedback I had was that this survey was not a big deal, and why do you make it so political? What the country should do now is focus on the economy and jobs. We should stay ahead of the G-7. The average person is not interested in why we're sitting here today. I don't think it's important. I think the most important thing is the economy and job creation.

1:25 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Lake Conservative Edmonton—Mill Woods—Beaumont, AB

Mr. Rutherford, you look as though you might want to weigh in on this.

1:25 p.m.

As an Individual

Dave Rutherford

There's just one thing. We talked about the validity of the answers if the questions are voluntary. I think that's the premise that the statisticians are suggesting, that a voluntary response doesn't have the same material value as a mandatory response.

I think that's pretty much what has been said.

1:25 p.m.

Liberal

Marc Garneau Liberal Westmount—Ville-Marie, QC

It isn't.

1:25 p.m.

As an Individual

Dave Rutherford

It isn't?

Mr. Garneau says it is not as good.

1:25 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Michael Chong

Mr. Garneau, Mr. Rutherford has the floor.

1:25 p.m.

As an Individual

Dave Rutherford

I just want to know if that is the premise, because clearly the obvious question—