Evidence of meeting #36 for International Trade in the 39th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was chair.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Dennis Seebach  Director, Administration and Technology Services, Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade
Marc Toupin  Procedural Clerk
Mary McMahon  Senior Counsel, Legal Services Branch, Canada Revenue Agency
Michael Solursh  Counsel, Trade Law Bureau, Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade
Cindy Negus  Manager, Legislative Policy Directorate, Canada Revenue Agency
Paul Robertson  Director General, North America Trade Policy, Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade

10:35 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Leon Benoit

You can't be, Mr. Julian. As you know, procedure does not allow for a point of order to be entertained during a recorded vote.

10:35 a.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP Burnaby—New Westminster, BC

Mr. Chair, with due respect, when you've changed the agenda around, as we did in the morning, and now we've changed the consideration of clause 10, we cannot vote on clause 10 having not considered the new clause 10.1; we cannot do that procedurally.

(Clause 10 as amended agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])

10:35 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Leon Benoit

Now, Mr. Julian, we could not discuss that during the vote. The vote is now--

10:35 a.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP Burnaby—New Westminster, BC

Mr. Chair, you cannot go over clause 10 and go back to a new clause 10.1.

10:35 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Leon Benoit

Clause 10.1 is actually the next clause. We are creating, should this pass, a new clause. If you look on the top of page 9, Mr. Julian, legislative counsel--unless you're questioning legislative counsel--have referred to this as a new clause. We have now passed clause 10. It relates to clause 10, but it is a new clause, and that's where....

Now we are going to new clause 10.1.

Yes, a point of order, Monsieur LeBlanc.

10:35 a.m.

Liberal

Dominic LeBlanc Liberal Beauséjour, NB

Mr. Chairman, just to be helpful, since we have passed clause 10, under the agenda that Mr. Julian has referred to, consequently we would be on new clause 10.1, which is created by CPC-2, or L-2; they're identical. I would invite you, Mr. Chairman, to ask somebody to move those amendments.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Leon Benoit

Except the issue is that we had agreed earlier...we passed a motion that we would go from clause 10 to clause 11--pardon me, the amendments on page 11; let's be clear on that.

Yes.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

Ted Menzies Conservative Macleod, AB

If I might, Mr. Chairman, part of that motion said the amendments pertaining to the Atlantic exemption be considered as a group.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Leon Benoit

Oh, that actually is correct. So we do then go to 10.1 now.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

Ted Menzies Conservative Macleod, AB

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Leon Benoit

Well, thank you.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

Ted Menzies Conservative Macleod, AB

Once again, I'm glad to help.

Once again in the absence of Mr. Casey, and in the spirit of helping a colleague in putting this forward in his place--just to be clear, we are on new clause 10.1 on page 9 of our booklet, so everyone knows exactly where we are. This would be classified as CPC-2. The amendment clarifies precisely the exclusions that were set forth in article X.1 of the agreement.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Leon Benoit

Mr. Menzies, are you going to move the motion?

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

Ted Menzies Conservative Macleod, AB

I would like to move the motion. Would you prefer that I move it before I read it?

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Leon Benoit

Yes, part of moving it wouldn't be reading it.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

Ted Menzies Conservative Macleod, AB

I move the motion.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Leon Benoit

Proceed.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

Ted Menzies Conservative Macleod, AB

Shall I read it, or since time is of the essence, should we--

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Leon Benoit

Everyone has it in front of them. That's fine. You don't have to read it. Go ahead.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

Ted Menzies Conservative Macleod, AB

Okay, so moved. Thank you.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Leon Benoit

Your debate on it, then.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

Ted Menzies Conservative Macleod, AB

I would just like to suggest that this clarifies precisely the exclusions that were set forth in article X, paragraph 1 of the agreement.

Subclause 10.1(1) specifically sets forth the three categories that were excluded from export charges under the softwood lumber agreement.

Subclause 10.1(2) defines deemed exports from Atlantic Canada and is moved from subclause 14(2).

Subclause 10.1(3) defines deemed exports from the Yukon, Northwest Territories, and Nunavut, and is moved from subclause 15(2). This section would even be better if the words “Despite section 10” in the first line of this amendment were deleted.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Leon Benoit

Mr. Menzies, you can't amend your own motion; someone else would have to.

November 7th, 2006 / 10:40 a.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

I'd be happy to.

10:40 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Leon Benoit

Okay, Brian Jean has moved that it's amended.

Just explain the amendment, Mr. Jean, or—