Thank you.
I'd like to move on to you, Ms. McClenaghan.
You spoke very eloquently about investor-state. Immediately after NAFTA was signed, the U.S. moved away from these rigid handcuffs that are the investor-state provisions of NAFTA. Other countries don't implement the kind of handcuffs that exist on investor-state where a corporate CEO basically can write his or her own cheque on any direct or indirect expropriation. Why do you think Canada is presumably the only country in the world that has this rigid, ideological adherence to strict NAFTA investor-state provisions in all its bilateral agreements?