I would just say that Mr. Plunkett is too optimistic about European bureaucracy and its efficiencies.
Part of my question actually was raised earlier by Mr. Trost, and I think it's been answered, but I just want to maybe touch a little bit on the issue of the dispute settlement mechanism--how it's going to work and whether a new framework is going to be established that is unique when compared to the ones we already have with NAFTA, and so forth.
I say that because my understanding of the European system is that it's very much protectionist and a very closed shop. In their procurement procedures they tend to put out specifications and certain provisions and processes that really, at the end of the day, only favour their own different countries. In fact, I have heard of incidents where some of them would work with certain private companies to actually get the procurement to be the way they want it and exclude any foreign type of procurement. That's the way they get around the idea of exclusionary biases they might have. But at the end of the day, the specifications are really much more tailored to their domestic and national interests.
How does one deal with these types of issues? Have you given some thought about this, and what type of mechanism is going to be in place? As I said, is it going to be a totally different framework that will look at these issues?
The question is open to anybody who wants to answer.