The prior negotiations of India help us a great deal, to the extent that the obligations that have been negotiated are satisfactory and sufficient to meet Canadian interests.
No trade agreement is a legal precedent for what you will negotiate with the next partner. Certainly how much leverage you have in negotiations matters, but they still provide a kind of a benchmark against which you can negotiate. The extent to which we can use the model that has already been successfully negotiated with India by others will help us move quickly in the negotiations.
We are hopeful that Europe will also help us in this regard by pushing the envelope a little. I said earlier a couple of times that Indian trade policy is a moving target. It's evolving all the time and tends toward increasing liberalization all the time. In each of their trade negotiations, they have addressed new issues or have gone a little further in what kinds of obligations they're willing to take. So yes, their existing agreements and their other negotiations help Canada push its own agenda in the negotiations.