I do. In fact, the federal government shares that concern as well. We saw that in the financial services negotiations as part of the CETA talks. They clearly didn't want to allow investor-state challenges to be directed at financial measures here in Canada. They expressly said that if that were the case there would be this kind of chill effect on our ability to put in place prudential measures to protect the financial system, for example to avert crisis.
If there's a chill effect in finance, I think it stands to reason that there's a chill effect in other areas: environmental policy, decisions related to mining concessions, oil and gas projects. In fact, we see globally that this is where the disputes are happening. Even here in Canada they're taking place against the fracking moratorium in Quebec. In Latin America the main focus is around very controversial public interest decisions related to mining, oil, gas, fracking, these kinds of things. We're just opening the floodgates, I think, with CETA to those kinds of challenges here in Canada.