Not at all. I haven't seen anything like that.
The quote that you are citing there is very important because that is the direction that the European Commission is going with the United States of America. Are we really considering that we will have a completely different arrangement than the U.S. has with regard to Europe, with regard to investor state?
I think that we should be stopping at this point and saying, “What about Canada?” Do we think that CETA should have language in it that protects the ability of governments in Canada to regulate on behalf of citizens and act on their behalf in the type of way that you've just described and that the European Commission is exploring in Europe?
This is an important moment, given the European Commission's decision, for Canada to say, “What kind of investor state, what kind of dispute settlement mechanisms do we want to see in CETA?” That is very challenging to do, given that we are in the dark, looking at leaked texts. I think the 26-page summary doesn't address that question and I think it's a very important question.