Evidence of meeting #15 for International Trade in the 41st Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was ceta.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Jock Finlayson  Executive Vice-President and Chief Policy Officer, Business Council of British Columbia
James Maynard  President and Chief Executive Officer, Wavefront Wireless Commercialization Centre Society
Blair Redlin  Research Consultant, CUPE BC
Derek Corrigan  Mayor, City of Burnaby
Sav Dhaliwal  Councillor, City of Burnaby
Bruce Banman  Mayor, City of Abbotsford
Bill Tam  President and Chief Executive Officer, BC Technology Industry Association
Marianne Alto  Councillor, City of Victoria
Rick Jeffery  President and Chief Executive Officer, Coast Forest Products Association
Debra Amrein-Boyes  President, Farm House Natural Cheeses
Sven Freybe  President, Freybe Gourmet Foods
Stan Van Keulen  Board Member, British Columbia Dairy Association
Gordon McCauley  Chair, Board of Directors, LifeSciences British Columbia
Paul Drohan  President and Chief Executive Officer, LifeSciences British Columbia

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

Russ Hiebert Conservative South Surrey—White Rock—Cloverdale, BC

Thank you to all of you for being with us this afternoon.

Mr. Van Keulen, you ran out of time at the end of your testimony when you were talking about the milk product fractionation that occurs in new technology. Would you like a few minutes to elaborate on what you wanted to say?

4:55 p.m.

Board Member, British Columbia Dairy Association

Stan Van Keulen

Yes. The legislation that protects us.... There are three pillars of supply management, and one of them is import controls. We have legislation that establishes what those products are that we have controls over. What the industry has been capable of doing in the last five or six years, and the last three of four years especially, is they've been able to fractionate the products down and then reconstitute them back into products. Those fractionated products were left behind in the last WTO agreement and were left behind in a lot of the agreements that are taking place. That's where the problem arises. There are no tariff lines on that.

We have supply management that is a bucket right now with a few holes in it. Consumption or sales are keeping up with those particular holes of leakages of whatever we're losing in the market. That's the dilemma we have right now. That's why we need government support if we're going to keep supply management intact the way that it's working. We need the government's support. There are people who are trying to circumvent the rules. There are very creative individuals who will try to bring in blends, milk powder that has a tariff on it, but they'll put rock salt in it or something like that and then filter out the rock salt later, or they'll throw something else in there. That's what those creative people were doing years ago. There are other creative things happening. Now with the new fractionated products, it's hard.

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

Russ Hiebert Conservative South Surrey—White Rock—Cloverdale, BC

You highlighted the fact that European farms are subsidized to the degree of 40%. I'm wondering if you could elaborate on how that compares to the amount of support that Canadian farmers receive from all levels of government.

4:55 p.m.

Board Member, British Columbia Dairy Association

Stan Van Keulen

There's no direct cash benefit from the Canadian government. There are direct payments in the European markets to producers. Because of the supply management system, we do not have any subsidies in that regard, cash benefits.

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

Russ Hiebert Conservative South Surrey—White Rock—Cloverdale, BC

If we were to take an unbiased clinical comparison between farms in both regions, would there be a way of determining what kind of support, direct or indirect, through taxation or other policies, each farm would be receiving? Is there a comparison that has been made or that could be made?

4:55 p.m.

Board Member, British Columbia Dairy Association

Stan Van Keulen

I don't think so, not that I'm aware of. Maybe there are smarter people out there who can, but I can't.

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

Russ Hiebert Conservative South Surrey—White Rock—Cloverdale, BC

You talked about the potential losses to the industry. With the expansion to this market, 100 million new consumers, is there any hope or prospect of exporting more product into the European Union and seeing this as an opportunity as opposed to a threat?

4:55 p.m.

Board Member, British Columbia Dairy Association

Stan Van Keulen

There was a question that was alluded to earlier here that we had a panel ruling against us because supply management is considered a subsidy when it comes to the pricing mechanisms. I did talk to one of my colleagues earlier about there being no reciprocal right now because of supply management. CETA says that we have unfettered access into the EU on dairy products and cheese. The reality is that's true if we get rid of supply management. My understanding is what has been told to me right now. I hope it's not true because then it's an opportunity. Clearly it's an opportunity. That's if it's not true.

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

Russ Hiebert Conservative South Surrey—White Rock—Cloverdale, BC

Thank you.

Mr. McCauley and Mr. Drohan, you talked about an orphan drug policy and attracting talent. On the orphan drug policy I didn't fully capture what you were trying to articulate. You're saying something should be adopted, a new orphan drug policy should be adopted. Could you briefly elaborate on that?

5 p.m.

Chair, Board of Directors, LifeSciences British Columbia

Gordon McCauley

Sure. The idea of creating patent and tax-based incentives for developers to go after orphan drugs, so the niche indication, has been a dramatic success from every perspective in the EU and the U.S. The U.S. originated it in 1983. In the EU I think it was in 2000 they implemented it.

What it does is provide an incentive for developers to go after very niche markets. It has proven to be an area where developers can actively prove out the effectiveness of a drug. It's critical for those patients, obviously, because you find yourself suffering from a particular orphan disease and there's nothing out there and there's no economic incentive, candidly, for a large drug developer because they tend to have bigger fish to fry. They go after larger markets than—

5 p.m.

Conservative

Russ Hiebert Conservative South Surrey—White Rock—Cloverdale, BC

And right now there's no incentive within the Canadian regime?

5 p.m.

Chair, Board of Directors, LifeSciences British Columbia

Gordon McCauley

None. In fact, for the company that I referenced, the final clinical trial we ran was actually going after an orphan indication. Had we been successful it's a product that wouldn't have been launched in Canada because it doesn't make economic sense.

5 p.m.

Conservative

Russ Hiebert Conservative South Surrey—White Rock—Cloverdale, BC

Right. To the Canadian market, but there would be a worldwide market and when you combine the beneficiaries would there be a large enough pool of people who would need the drug to make it worthwhile?

5 p.m.

Chair, Board of Directors, LifeSciences British Columbia

Gordon McCauley

If you were to develop that drug in Canada and go for approval in the EU and the U.S. exclusively, you'd almost certainly see the company leave the country, almost certainly. It wouldn't make any economic sense whatsoever to have the company here.

5 p.m.

Conservative

Russ Hiebert Conservative South Surrey—White Rock—Cloverdale, BC

You also highlighted attracting talent and the temporary access, but then you suggested that it didn't go far enough. Could you elaborate on what more needs to be done to permit visa-free access?

5 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rob Merrifield

Please give a very quick answer in the time we've got.

5 p.m.

President and Chief Executive Officer, LifeSciences British Columbia

Paul Drohan

What we're asking for is about how when we looked through CETA we didn't have clear guidance that research scientists were going to be covered under a temporary entry into the country. If that is indeed the case, fantastic. If it's not the case, we're asking to make sure that as we implement CETA this is one aspect of CETA that is covered off.

5 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rob Merrifield

Thank you very much.

Mr. Pacetti.

5 p.m.

Liberal

Massimo Pacetti Liberal Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel, QC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Thank you to the witnesses for coming today.

My first question is to you, Mr. Van Keulen. I'm not sure if I understood. The Canada-European Union comprehensive economic and trade agreement, will it or will it not help your industry innovate?

Did you say it will or will not? I'm not sure what I understood. Did you say that at all?

5 p.m.

Board Member, British Columbia Dairy Association

Stan Van Keulen

No, I didn't say that.

5 p.m.

Liberal

Massimo Pacetti Liberal Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel, QC

Okay. I wasn't sure in what fashion you would be able to innovate. You're stuck in a sector where you're just selling milk in your province. How far can you go with your product?

5 p.m.

Board Member, British Columbia Dairy Association

Stan Van Keulen

All across the country. There are some export opportunities in certain areas, but not a lot. Under the trade agreements that we have there are some quotas that we can fill abroad.

5 p.m.

Liberal

Massimo Pacetti Liberal Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel, QC

Where would those possibilities be?

5 p.m.

Board Member, British Columbia Dairy Association

Stan Van Keulen

The U.S., and I think Europe. In England we have a cheese quota, a cheddar cheese quota, of a certain amount.

5 p.m.

Liberal

Massimo Pacetti Liberal Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel, QC

With free trade would you be able to go to Europe? Would you be able to increase your capacity?