Thank you for the question.
There's a premise in your question that I do not accept, which is that the way to engage at the level of trade and investment is through the particular FTA that is being proposed. I disagree with that.
Brazil rejected the idea of a free trade area of the Americas, the kind of agreement that is being proposed here with Honduras, because of structural problems in the agreement, some of which I mentioned in my talk, such as investor-state loss mechanisms that are highly detrimental for development. Brazil is doing fantastically in terms of trade engagement, and Canada and Brazil have a very strong relationship that is not embodied in an agreement.
I think trade and investment engagement are very important. This specific agreement in front of us has very problematic features if our intention is to help the poorest of the poor in Honduras.