For the resolution on the technical side of things, I think one of the key components that's required is a willing partner to have a discussion with and with whom to exchange information. That requires confirmation of engagement and engagement in good faith. I think that means, as well, agreeing on a reasonable time frame to conduct the review that is required. I'm not privy to the extent to which those conversations have happened. I understand that attempts have been made to engage with the Chinese technical experts. I'm not close enough to the situation to know how much further it's gotten beyond that.
In my view, engagement or failure to engage ought to be measured by the ability to reach a conclusion within a set time frame. I think we have to understand what is a fair time for people acting in good faith to review the evidence and come to a conclusion on that.
I would suggest that the absence of being able to either meet that time or even being able to agree on the process is a sign of not being prepared to address the issue meaningfully.