Yes, but you acknowledge that a subsequent decision was made to adopt two approaches, one for the platform and another for the computer platform. It was like deciding to put a Ford dashboard in a Chrysler car. That would not work well. Why was that decision made? It was because they did not want to buy the same helicopter as in the contract they had cancelled, which had cost $700 million. You are saying, in veiled terms—I understand that—that you think there was political interference.
I don't have much time left. Isn't it important for Canadian industry to benefit from economic spinoffs? Moreover, we must also look at whether we are in a position to build this type of equipment. I find that lacking. I don't think that the Department of Industry can represent everyone. If representatives of Canadian industry were present, they could indicate what they are in a position to offer in terms of future contracts.
I think you are right in saying that we cannot build all parts of the C-17 in Canada. However, if certain companies were around the table and the decisions were made, they could provide important insight. Are you in favour of industry representatives being involved in the procurement approach?