I was going to ask my next two questions, and each of you can answer, just so that we can apportion our time properly.
In your presentation, Mr. Rowe, you mentioned that you take care of the complete suite of services for equipment for other countries. Given that, I'm wondering about the potential threat to their national security by us, as a foreign country, with your company taking care of their equipment. Also, there is the fact that the procurement process does tend to take so long--the decision on the right thing. During that span of time, Canada often leases equipment from other countries, and by the same argument it could be stated that that in itself would be a matter of national security.
The question I have is this. In your recent article in FrontLine Defence, you mentioned the Cormorant helicopter and the difficulties in acquiring the data package from the OEM. Now, I believe I.M.P. currently has the ISS contract for the Cormorant. Why didn't the previous Liberal government negotiate this at the time of purchase?