I'll mention two things, if I might, in an attempt to answer your question.
Our consultation process told us that there is a mounting deficit in private sector R and D related to defence, and that is in part driven by the absence of an industrial strategy that would drive private sector investment. We can't be complacent about that. The status quo is not an acceptable option because the world is not waiting for Canada to catch up. In the opinion of our industrial sector, more money into private-sector-led R and D was important. Now, who drives that bus? There has to be a relationship between industry and government in terms of what is important, but once that decision has been made--and let's assume that it's co-developed and that each party is putting some money in--then the question is what do you do with the results of that S and T or research and development? Who owns the intellectual property associated with that? It's our view that the ownership of that R and D should be largely held within the industrial hands, because industry is much better capable of commercializing that R and D work into product capability and services that will serve not just a military customer but also a commercial customer and thereby make that entity more competitive in the domestic environment and more ready to compete internationally.