It wouldn't be very high. I would be very loath to deploy the forces without a significant commitment from the international community, and in particular from our larger allies, to those types of missions.
Getting back to this point, I think it's fair to say that we may not have had a crystal ball in 2005 when deciding to go to Kandahar. But I believe the historical records will show that this decision was made somewhat off the cuff and perhaps not with the best understanding of what mission success would entail and what it would look like. Simply wanting to contribute to foreign defence, wanting to have a role in the world, can sometimes get you into a great deal of trouble and into commitments you simply are not prepared to undertake over the long term. That is really the point I'm trying to raise. Our enthusiasm for playing a role in the world should not get ahead of our assessment of what we can actually contribute over the long term.