I realize that you're not acting on behalf of the commission when matters go before the Federal Court or other bodies. I'm thinking more in terms of your sitting at the head of the table when these high-paid fancy lawyers are making.... In my experience, lawyers can certainly argue about anything and make points that are the most indefensible and argue them with the greatest level of confidence you could imagine. A judge with experience could just as quickly dismiss them.
I just wonder if you feel satisfied operating in that circumstance. Are you satisfied that you have sufficient advice from commission counsel and from your own counsel in terms of handling these situations?