I will answer the second question first.
As we note in Canada Command—and I think it very much drives home the point of the question—what you have is individuals, men and women in uniform, who come to work every day not just in Ottawa but across the country in regional headquarters, focused on one thing: Canada. The view was that perhaps it was time the military had an organization that was focused on the home game, focused on Canada, focused on providing effective support to all of the civilians in different federal, territorial, and provincial departments across Canada, and to be prepared to be there if needed, given the changing nature of what happened after 9/11 and in different areas. Bringing it together has proven to be very effective. Again, as I state, you have individuals who come to work every day doing one thing, focused on Canada.
For example, if I may, we have morning update briefings, and they are focused first on weather in Canada, what's happened across Canada from an incident point of view on the civilian side, train derailments and the like, any search and rescue, ongoing operations. What we have right now, for example, is Operation Palaci at Rogers Pass. We have artillery guns that are there supporting Parks Canada to ensure that goods and services can continue to move through Rogers Pass, which supports the movement of goods and services across the country. Canada Command was put into place for that real reason, to have Canada focused as a theatre, an area where people came to work every day and focused on it, so when the call came, we were there as quickly as we could be because we had good situational awareness and we had contingency plans ready to put into place.