I read what you published. You explain that choosing a fighter jet is a policy and strategic decision. Choosing a latest generation high performance aircraft, for example, makes it possible to make policy decisions based on what we want to do rather than on our limits. It is really all about capabilities. In the case of the F-35s, there is also the issue of the associated cost overruns.
When does this investment designed to give us capabilities stop being advantageous for the country, for example, if it interferes with something else and compromises other things, from the budgetary perspective?