Thanks, Chair, and thanks to our witnesses for a very stimulating discussion so far.
If there was a small chuckle on our side when you mentioned that it was a Hungarian national, it's only because one of our members, who is absent, would be able to understand him in his national language, which is not a gift many of us have.
Thank you also, Ms. Sinclair, for the concept of “not nationally based insurgents”. I'm going to use that in another context. It expresses very well a challenge that we all know, of which we are all painfully aware in Afghanistan and elsewhere.
Going back to the strategic concept, which is the theme of our report and which was very helpfully described in its broadest terms in your presentation, you've reminded us that there are these three fundamental tasks. Collective defence is, in a sense, a legacy from the past. That has existed since 1949 and in part is a legacy of the Cold War. Crisis management is something that is coming increasingly to the fore in the post-Cold War era, with the Balkans and successive missions that you mentioned. Then cooperative security is this concept of reaching out to a broader and broader range of partners and contacts through the various fora that you've described.
My impression, as a member of Parliament, as one of your former colleagues on the diplomatic circuit, is that crisis management really does take up most of the alliance's effort under this strategic concept. Is that correct or would you say...? How would you express the priority that's given to these three? Is it equal? Is there a precedent? Give us a view.