Okay. What about new threats? You mentioned this assistant secretary general, but from the perspective of our committee, as you know, we studied readiness, and a recurring theme with almost every witness was that you have to do these things to be ready and to achieve high readiness, but no one can really answer the question of “Ready for what?” in today's world.
You can certainly discuss probabilities and so forth. Do we have a collective NATO staff, body, or joint staff that tries to look over the horizon at what operations may be coming into play a year down the road, or five years down the road?
Obviously, no one predicted quite the Libya operation that we ended up with. Certainly, no one predicted 9/11 on its scale. Is someone at least trying?