Thank you. That's a great question.
Every so often people muse about whether we could get away from the consensus principle. But the importance of the alliance speaking with one voice, even if it's at the highest strategic level and then countries individually, nationally, decide how they're going to play that out, that remains so important in terms of the political projection of the alliance. That solidarity is extremely important and that debate to even get to consensus, when you know you're going into a discussion with countries that, frankly, might not even be interested. They have no desire to participate, but they can understand and put themselves in the shoes of their NATO colleagues, to say we understand this is important to you. It's a sophisticated and torturous exercise at times. But I don't think that moving to a Security Council-type model for decision-making would ever take off in any way.
What we are seeing, though, is more—and this refers to an earlier discussion—coalitions of the like-minded, who are going to do certain things together in certain ways under the rubric of an overarching whole-of-NATO decision.