I'm not going to allow any more debate on this. That's a debatable issue.
I've checked with the clerk. It's right in chapter 20 that dilatory motions are anything that are to limit debate, to adjourn, or to change process. It's not substantive. It's not about changing a motion itself. This is about procedure in terms of the way the committee functions.
I'm going to go straight to the vote. All those in favour of the motion?