Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
You broached the area of concern with regard to nuclear capabilities or proliferation, and of course we don't think North Korea has anything to do...or has the capability. Getting back to Iran, and also of course the India-Pakistan issue, which I think we sometimes leave out, NATO does have an interest vis-à-vis Pakistan in particular because of the nature of the Afghanistan conflict. And of course we deal with the Middle East, and to call the capabilities there a “powder keg” would be an understatement.
So given all the complexities and variations in national interests, and in particular and more specifically as it relates to Iran, because it is a true rogue nation in that it aspires to something other than just maintaining its own nation.... It's actually a bit of a jihad, if you can use that expression when you talk about an ability with nuclear weapons.
How do you begin to square some of those different...? How do you begin to make some sense of that whole mishmash? When you talk about nuclear disarmament, the main word you use is trust, and I don't see that anywhere. If you could use the trust element in nuclear disarmament in those areas, how would you go about doing that?