I'm not sure I should wear out another mike.
I'm only kidding.
Clearly this is a fundamental principle that has been stated in this committee before. We've had high authority for it. It's a reasonable provision. I haven't heard the counter-arguments.
We do hear that people should have some knowledge of the military, but that doesn't have to be current knowledge. It doesn't need to be somebody who's in the chain of command going over to the grievances board to introduce whatever thoughts or feelings or views that person has as a serving member of the military, reporting in the chain of command as somebody else, or going back to report to the same people they reported to before because they're seconded.
That's not right. It's not independent. It's not external. It's not necessary.