Thank you very much for the question. It's a very important one in terms of how the history of warfare develops. It's exactly there.
In agrarian days when we were soldiers or farmers and the aim of war was to actually capture land, it was because that's how you made money. Land was how you made money. Now that the economy has moved, how you make money is through dealing with information and exchanging information. Having the capability to affect that is the new domain of warfare. Most militaries have recognized this, that to be able to prosecute war or defend against any war or attack, there needs to be a cyberdomain.
As you mentioned, some countries have that specific doctrine. For Russia and China, it's actually written in their doctrine; there's no secret about it. They've worked very hard to invest a significant amount of resources to do it, so we need to do the same thing in terms of being able to defend against that. The component of what becomes offensive, what is counterattack, and all of this, is still an evolving part of a warfare domain doctrine. That argument still happens in western countries. In terms of developing our doctrine into this, not just Canada, but the rest of the west is not as far advanced as Russia or China would be.