Ferry and I have a bit of a disagreement there. I think we've overused the word “terrorism”. I think terrorism has become a word for which we're prepared to trade off an awful lot of liberties. I think it was Thomas Jefferson who said that those who would be willing to trade their civil rights or liberties for security actually deserve neither. I think it's overstated.
There is a threat. Is it a strategic threat? I don't think so. Was the Boston bombing an act of terror? Certainly. But in that sense, so was Sandy Hook, with 26 kids being killed. Are we making the distinction because somebody was just self-radicalized, or somebody became self-deluded and killed 26 kids?
I think we use that word far too sparingly. If you look in our report, you'll actually see a diminution of terrorist threats, let's say, in the last 15 years—