All right.
I got a different impression from you, Mr. Saideman, that it's more about having clarity as to what it is we're trying to accomplish, what our strategy is, and having a strategy that really helps make decisions and choose priorities. I got the impression also that you felt there could be a better job done in military procurement that might actually give us more bang for the buck than the way we've been doing it.
I'm really interested in the idea of strategy, so my first question is this. Do you see this as needing to be done as sort of an inclusive strategy that includes, as some of the other committee testimony has suggested, foreign policy, defence policy, trade policy, foreign aid policy? Should the strategy be to do an overarching thing, and then from that drop out a defence policy, or is it your view that we can go right to having a coherent defence policy that can create some direction and prioritization?