Yes, I understand the question perfectly well. Thank you.
Again, it's based on the facts. I'm not in that situation. I personally agree. I can't see how initially, with those set of facts, a commander would simply say, “Well, that's not sexual assault”. If he did, then I would suggest that would be an improper use of his judgment in that case.
That's why in all those cases, we worked very hard both within the military justice system and, as General Millar said, through education and training, so that when those incidents do come to a commanding officer's attention, or anybody else's attention because there's an obligation on all members to report service offences or their belief that a service offence has occurred.... When those facts are then presented to investigators and then, potentially, eventually to prosecutors, I would be very, very surprised if they did not end up in a charge.