Certainly from my perspective there's a fine line between deterrence and de-escalation.
NATO had a couple of objectives. One was to reassure those Central European members of NATO that we've been discussing, but the second part was actually to also show the agility and flexibility of NATO across a wide spectrum. That's why you've seen responses in increased numbers in the air policing missions, our deployment to Romania, and the Toronto and the increase in the Standing NATO Maritime Group. In showing that agility, it would certainly hope to offer food for thought to belligerent nations within there that NATO retains the capability. That's where I draw the line: to a de-escalation theme within that.