I agree with my colleague.
The only thing I would add is that when we talk about the Arctic question, about opening up the Arctic, the need to invest in infrastructure, and which departments and government institutions are going to take lead roles and what roles they should take, one of the things we naturally turn to is talking about the military. There's a variety of reasons why that military capability—not for military purposes, traditional war fighting, or defence purposes—is always a dominant consideration by government.
The Russians are doing the same thing. They face the same problems of infrastructure, investments, how to manage this, and where to turn. Like us, they'll turn to the military to do it, and not necessarily in a threatening manner.