You are very nice.
The report also states that Canada and the U.S cooperate quite well and effectively in the Arctic through NORAD, and do so despite disagreements over certain waterways.
My colleagues and I talked about that and Ms. Charron also pointed to the importance of not having just a military presence. There are a number of related aspects. Clearly, there is military defence, search and rescue, and potential pollution problems in the event of a spill. In light of all those potential tragedies in the Arctic, how do your studies see NORAD's contribution? Is NORAD a priority in all those cases?