In some cases the underspend, as you've characterized it, is a function of smaller projects that are related to other modernization and capital programs, and those have been reiterated in the recent defence acquisition guide. Those are the key priority investment areas from the RCN's perspective that cover the spectrum of missile systems, underwater warfare systems, boats, tugboats, and things like this that are fairly fundamental to our business. They're all part of a systemic approach to modernization because it's not just one fell swoop.
As it relates to the NSPS programs themselves, they're moving along. As I said, we're optimistic, quite confident we're going to be cutting steel on the Harry DeWolf-class within the next nine months. Sure, we're not where we thought we would be—and you'd have to talk to the chief financial officer as to the specific underspends in specific dollars—but as it relates to the schedule, there is a direct correlation between schedule delays and spending delays.
I'd leave it at that. I'm not the expert in...