Specifically with regard to cybersecurity, the challenge is that we are usually playing defence, so we are reacting to an event. In so many of the incidents where the law enforcement and the military have had to coordinate, for example, the Vancouver Olympics, they've had the benefit of advanced planning to work through some of the issues, to war-game them, and to test procedures. However, with cybersecurity, both of us have been caught flat-footed or back-footed as we try to get involved too late, after an incursion has occurred.
This is particularly true with regard to civilian systems, such as systems of defence contractors or even public health systems that may be hacked by hackers from abroad, where we are not even monitoring what's going on there. We may be the last to know on the official side, and we need to play catch-up.
With regard to cybersecurity coordination, I think the key is for our officials on the cyber-defence side to talk to each other, do a bit more war-gaming, and try to prepare, because they are almost always going to be in that reactive mode, which I think is a disadvantage when going into a cyber-attack.