I think it's looking at the purpose of Russia's combat forces. If they're using them or envisaging them as expeditionary forces, I have no idea where they're going to go. We have enough difficulty historically in sustaining our own forces in our own Arctic, so the thought that the Russians are going to send land forces to parachute down on Canadian sovereign territory and effectively create World War III, to me is a very unlikely scenario, a highly improbable scenario.
What we have invested in or what we're focusing on—in terms of developing Arctic response company groups based around capabilities down south, exercised in the north, and guided, led, and trained by Canadian Rangers—in my mind is an appropriate measure to show that we are committed to defence and to creating very interesting and exciting training scenarios for members of the Canadian Armed Forces who get to go north and learn a bit about their country as well as develop their own capabilities that are deployable all around the world. It's also to show the flag, if nothing else, to convince Canadians that we're doing something urgent in the region. To me, that's sufficient.
So, again, the Canadian Airborne Regiment disbanding is a wonderful topic I'd love to debate from the standpoint of our having the capabilities to be able to respond to the very highly improbable, unlikely scenario of a Russian incursion. I think we would find that we would have a lot of allies who would come to our support as well to join us. But we certainly have the capabilities to go and meet any threat that I'd anticipate in that sense.