I'd rather Art McDonald start, and then I'll write notes and think about it as he goes.
We are a very proud nation. The reflection of that is that we're a really proud navy. We don't abrogate sovereignty to anybody in any way, shape, or form. At a government level, government has put its cards in NATO, and they've made bold statements, even since the election, about their resolve and standing behind NATO. We stand behind NORAD. We've made statements about the shipbuilding strategy, which feeds capability into that relationship. We're feeding capability into both NORAD and North American aerospace defence that is relevant to those alliances. I don't think anybody sees NORAD or NATO as being an abrogation of either the nation's sovereignty or the sovereignty of our navy.
I'm trying to do my best to answer your question. I think we strive to have the most important and fundamental capabilities in the navy, with our brothers and sisters in the Royal Canadian Air Force, who provide long-range patrol aviation, which is relevant to the maritime battle, to the Cyclone helicopters, which are really fundamental to anti-submarine warfare and to the surveillance and the targeting of our missiles, to our SOFCOM colleagues who deliver high-end strike forces in everything from counterterrorism to the interdiction and embargo scenarios—