The question is, what policy direction does this procurement strategy respond to? As I said, “Strong, Secure, Engaged” is already from 2017. Six years is a long time in terms of the evolution of the security landscape and the security environment. All of these conversations, even about F-35s or about new capabilities or shipbuilding—all of these things—must beg the question: What is the intended role of the Canadian Armed Forces?
In that context, for instance, references to the United States, the United Kingdom or other allies may or may not be fully relevant, because Canada has identified Arctic sovereignty, protection of Canadian citizens and, for instance, peacekeeping as historical priorities that may not align with those of our allies. They're instructed to—