That actually goes to the point that Mr. Fadden made about politics and opposition politics and how this is weighed in elections. There's a decades-long history of this. I was in my early formative years of political activism when a government opposed a helicopter contract. Canadians, though, have become used to this over the decades.
To the point that you made, is there now more risk, maybe, in the dithering that goes on over years and years and years, sometimes decades, to produce equipment? Is there even more political risk or embarrassment risk around that than just getting on with something and maybe making a mistake and taking a hit in the short term politically?