I just want to address one thing we talked about, the F-35. That is a game-changer in terms of security. In terms of C4ISR, interoperability and JADC2, that is an enabler. I think this is the right time for industry and government to sit down and map that out carefully. It took the Australians six years to get the infrastructure and security requirements in place to accept the first F-35. We've talked to BAE.
In terms of the transition of the F-18, industry can help transition the F-35 and the F-18 to ensure that we can actually get them pilots to help with the transition and we can actually improve their maintenance. It's determining what's required and making the decision to get on with it as opposed to defaulting to the traditional “have to go through the competition process and have to make it fair and transparent”. This is a national sovereignty issue. I think that's where we often get tripped up in terms of getting things done and not allowing ourselves to get on with the case at hand.
In terms of adding requirements—you mentioned the Canadian surface combatant, which has been going on several years—I don't think you'll ever be able to stop some confusion or some issues that pop up with requirements, but I think fundamentally there was a disconnect in terms of the initial requirements that were asked for and the understanding of what the proposal was.