In general terms, this is obviously an issue that we spend a fair bit of time talking about with our union colleagues. Of course, we're all interested in the same outcome, which is to make sure that we have the infrastructure in place to support members of the Canadian Armed Forces in all of the work that we ask them to do.
Because we share that objective, we were able to come up with some arrangements and understanding about how to talk about the assessment of facility maintenance contracts, for example. Again, Serge will be able to speak to this in more detail on the housing front.
If we have a new facility, a very large facility, coming online, for example, we always take the time to do a business case analysis of how we want to maintain that building going forward: Would in-house make more sense, civil servants doing the work, as I think you're describing, or is it through private contractors or some combination of both?
Currently, I would describe the organization overall as being that sort of hybrid approach—that last approach—where some of the work is done in-house and some of the work is contracted out. There are all sorts of reasons for why we might partner with a private sector contractor. I'm happy to go into that in more detail, but I'll stop there for now.