More time is needed. All I said is that 2010 is a bit too close to make a decision on biodiesel.
As far as conservation is concerned, we're not very credible in the industry when we tell people to cut down on their consumption. However, we would like that to happen, for all sorts of reasons that I could explain if you wish.
Canada is going to generate about 800 megatons of greenhouse gases or CO2 equivalent. Here, we're only talking of 3 to 5 Mt. The automobile sector accounts for 25% of this 800 Mt. Keep this in mind: if today's vehicles were as heavy as in 1985 and if we were using engines with the same power as in 1985, we would be using 30% less gas, which represents 60 Mt.
So, we're all for a national policy on ethanol, absolutely, but why is there such a deafening silence on conservation measures when the benefits would be so obvious?