I would simply say from my perspective, if there are suggestions or ideas about how we could get more players involved in providing this.... If we do get another 9/11 sort of shock, how are we then going to do what we need to do for this industry?
On my second question, I believe it's clause 25 that's one of your concerns, if I am getting my two clauses correctly here--or clause 24, the 50% by regulation and so forth. It's clause 24. Pardon me.
Again, I'm not a lawyer, but looking at that clause, it leaves a considerable amount of flexibility. From my perspective, it leaves it very wide open. Again, why do you feel it would be so critical? Is it a large cost difference for the industry, 50 versus zero? My understanding from reading it is you still have to negotiate with the minister. You can still have 100% insurance or theoretically zero percent insurance on it. So could you elaborate in more detail what would be the effective costs passed through to the consumer, passed through to you as producers?