Just to clarify and follow up on Mr. Bevington's point, I want to make it clear that if, God forbid, a terrorist incident occurred, the crown is not responsible for the coverage. It's the insurance company. It would still fall as if an incident occurred, so it would still be covered under the insurance policies, and it would still be covered under the act. Is that correct?
On December 6th, 2007. See this statement in context.