We already have agreement, Mr. Chairman. I don't need to make the comment. It's just that when I read the motion I thought we were going to be discussing looking into nuclear safety issues. I didn't realize it was going to be a “he said, she said”, dissecting letters. I had no idea that there was already information on what the minister was going to focus on. I thought we were talking about the safety of Canadians and their health and well-being. Is all this discussion of who's going first, who's going second--he said, she said--relevant to this motion?
On January 15th, 2008. See this statement in context.